Governance · Concept
Open Problems in AI Incident Governance
An analysis finds inconsistent definitions, taxonomies, and reporting practices across existing AI incident governance frameworks, limiting incident analysis depth.
Standardized AI incident taxonomies and reporting mechanisms are urgently needed across regulatory and independent frameworks.
Connections
Connections · 5
How this node ties into the rest of the map, and the evidence behind each link.
Empirical SOT study explains weak taxonomy uptake via invisible design choices and missing accountability links.
+4 growthOpen problems in AI incident governance analysis examines existing frameworks including those by regulatory bodies, relevant to AIM's mandate.
+3 growthOpen Problems in AI Incident Governance examines existing frameworks including OECD's AIM monitor.
+3 growthAISA turns unstructured incident narratives into retrievable planning evidence for construction safety governance.
+3 growthOpen problems in AI incident governance analysis is directly relevant to improving AI risk incident datasets like RiskNet.
+2 growthSignal sources
Signal sources
Dated facts from primary sources in this direction.
EU AI Act obligations for general-purpose AI models applied from 2 Aug 2025; high-risk obligations under Annex III apply from 2 Aug 2026.
EU AI Act — implementation tracker →The Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI — the first legally binding international AI treaty — opened for signature in Sep 2024; the EU ratified it on 15 May 2026.
Council of Europe →On 26 Aug 2025 the UN General Assembly created an Independent International Scientific Panel on AI (40 experts) and a Global Dialogue on AI Governance.
United Nations →