Society · Concept
Philosophical Vertigo from Human-AI Interaction
Describes ontological shock and epistemic destabilisation from emotionally salient long AI conversations and AI discourse.
Safety and mental-health governance may need protocols for AI-induced worldview destabilisation.
Connections
Connections · 4
How this node ties into the rest of the map, and the evidence behind each link.
Emotionally salient persuasive AI conversations are a pathway into ontological shock and epistemic destabilisation.
+4 growthPersuasive long emotionally salient AI dialogues are a pathway into ontological shock and epistemic destabilisation.
+4 growthPersuasive long-form AI dialogue is a pathway into ontological shock and epistemic destabilisation.
+4 growthEmotionally salient long conversations can induce ontological shock, expanding affective safety concerns.
+3 growthSignal sources
Signal sources
Dated facts from primary sources in this direction.
An OECD review of ~200 government AI use cases found 57% support automating or tailoring public services and 45% enhance decision-making — most still stuck in pilots.
OECD — Governing with AI →A Stanford payroll study found a 13% relative decline in employment for workers aged 22–25 in AI-exposed occupations since late 2022, while older peers held steady.
Stanford Digital Economy Lab →Microsoft reported AI-enhanced phishing reached a 54% click-through rate (4.5× traditional) and AI-generated fake IDs grew 195% globally in 2025.
Microsoft — Digital Defense Report 2025 →