Safety · Trend
Dual-Use AI Capabilities and Bioterrorism Risk
GovAI threat-modeling work on frontier AI biological dual-use capabilities and bioterrorism misuse pathways.
Forecast horizon
Agentic biosecurity benchmarks becoming essential for frontier model safety evaluations.
Connections
Connections · 4
How this node ties into the rest of the map, and the evidence behind each link.
to · informs 4/10
EU AI Act Dual-use biological capability evaluations by frontier AI companies may become mandatory under high-risk AI provisions of the EU AI Act.
+4 growth to · tracked by 4/10
ABC-Bench: Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark ABC-Bench was designed to measure agentic biosecurity-relevant capabilities relevant to dual-use AI risks.
+4 growth from · tracked by 4/10
ABC-Bench: Agentic Bio-Capabilities Benchmark SciConBench evaluates AI agents' scientific synthesis capabilities in health domains, relevant to dual-use biosecurity risk assessment.
+4 growth from · tracked by 3/10
Centre for the Governance of AI (GovAI) GovAI published a report on dual-use AI capabilities and the risk of bioterrorism.
+3 growthSignal sources
Signal sources
Dated facts from primary sources in this direction.
US evaluation centre Jun 2025
In June 2025 the US AI Safety Institute was renamed the Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI), pivoting toward security, standards and adversary-model assessment.
NIST → Frontier safeguards May 2025
Anthropic activated its ASL-3 deployment and security standard with Claude Opus 4 on 22 May 2025 — the first real-world trigger of a responsible-scaling tier, focused on blocking bio-weapon uplift.
Anthropic → Cross-border testing 2025
The International Network of AI Safety Institutes (launched Nov 2024) ran a third joint testing exercise focused on agentic AI systems across cyber and fraud strands.
European Commission — AI Office →