Governance · Concept
Constitutional Coverage Trilemma in AI Governance
Audit finding frontier model default constitutions cover only a tiny fraction of plural human value demand, leaving many users homeless.
Within-family drift further reduces autonomy while raising safety/equity emphasis.
Connections
Connections · 4
How this node ties into the rest of the map, and the evidence behind each link.
Both papers address gaps between societal risk/value demand and current technical-institutional AI governance supply.
+4 growthPerspective-aware evaluation rejects single consensus labels, aligning with evidence that constitutional value demand is broad and plural.
+4 growthBroad five-value user demand versus narrow drifting model constitutions leaves large user constituencies uncovered.
+3 growthDemand for constitutional value rankings is broad while frontier supply is narrow, formalizing plurality shortfalls in defaults.
+3 growthSignal sources
Signal sources
Dated facts from primary sources in this direction.
EU AI Act obligations for general-purpose AI models applied from 2 Aug 2025; high-risk obligations under Annex III apply from 2 Aug 2026.
EU AI Act — implementation tracker →The Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI — the first legally binding international AI treaty — opened for signature in Sep 2024; the EU ratified it on 15 May 2026.
Council of Europe →On 26 Aug 2025 the UN General Assembly created an Independent International Scientific Panel on AI (40 experts) and a Global Dialogue on AI Governance.
United Nations →