Capabilities · Trend
Science of AI Training Dynamics
Position paper argues AI research must move beyond post-hoc analysis to study training dynamics that produce model behavior, extending scaling laws to capabilities, biases, and safety-relevant properties.
Connections
Connections · 2
How this node ties into the rest of the map, and the evidence behind each link.
A scientific understanding of training dynamics is a prerequisite for designing verifiable training specifications used in ZK proof architectures.
+4 growthSystematic probabilistic reasoning failures in LLMs motivate studying training dynamics to understand why these biases emerge and persist.
+4 growthSignal sources
Signal sources
Dated facts from primary sources in this direction.
The length of software tasks AI agents can do autonomously at 50% reliability has doubled about every 7 months — and since 2024 closer to every ~3 months.
METR →In one year scores rose by 18.8, 48.9 and 67.3 points on MMMU, GPQA and SWE-bench; real-world software solve rate jumped from 4.4% to 71.7%.
Stanford HAI — AI Index 2025 →On SWE-bench Verified (500 real GitHub issues), autonomous coding agents reached ~80–86% by late 2025, up from under 50% in early 2025.
Epoch AI →